Jan Atle Ramsli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This looks like the response I got the last time.
How long did it take you to provoke the last time? > I try to _understand_, I try to find some common ground, what are >the guidelines, how am I to proceeed? If the idea of 'strategy' and >'interrupt' sections have been abandoned, I want to know: Why? What >was wrong with them? I don't think you try to understand. At least that's not how to you started this thread anyway. > I try to say: This is how _I_ do it, this is what _I_ know, is there >any way that this can fit in? What theoretical background do I need >... etc. .. etc... Maybe that was what you tried to do, but that is far from what you accomplished. So far all I have seen are blanket assertions regarding the elitism of the Hurd developers. Not to mention the fact that you think if you started over you could do what has been done over the last 10 years in, what, 2? >> Otherwise it looks alot like you're throwing terms around just to >> sound good. > > > .. with the purpose of _____? How could we know? You are the one doing it. I learned all those theoretical buzz words in first year of Unversity too. Maybe you should try doing something before complaining. Ryan -- Ryan Golbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Computer Science, University Of Waterloo GPG: 1024D/78916B84 -- 1B1B 2A87 3F00 A7FB 40F3 526D 36CF BA44 7891 6B84 _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
