On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 04:03:21PM +0200, Jan Atle Ramsli wrote: > I try to _understand_, I try to find some common ground, what are the > guidelines, how am I to proceeed?
I have just checked. From what I have in my mail archive, you asked one question on bug-hurd in November last year, about what HURD_PORT_USE does in glibc. You received three responses, one from me, one from Nils who knows the Hurd design quite well, and Thomas replied to Nils clarifying it even further. This is from the person who started it all. I wish _I_ would get such a detailed coverage in response to my questions all the time. > If the idea of 'strategy' and 'interrupt' sections have been abandoned, > I want to know: Why? > What was wrong with them? I think you are not asking clear questions. I never heard of these terms before you mentioned them here, but whatever. We have a lot of strategy, and of course we have interrupts. So, I am very sorry, but I have not the slightest idea what you are talking about. How about asking some concrete questions? If we don't know what you are worrying about we can not tell you why you don't need to worry! Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
