"Ryan M. Golbeck" wrote: > > As I said above, you misinterpreted his words (afiak) by taking them > too far.
So, I can safely assume that some word just flew a little to high for me, that ADTs are as valid as when I read about them for the first time, and that they are valid under the same rules that guide everything else: Relativity? There is no 'ADT demise' it is just not presented as something 'new' anymore, that was what I was supposed to have understood? The more specific I try to be, the more specific the answers will be, and the more strain my language skills will exposed to, I am already at the outer limits of what I can express in English. So I, on my behalf and may others, ask for continued patience like this. I know it takes longer to explain it to me than to many others, but once explained, I promise I will not forget it, and I will take over and even try to explain it further. This may become logarithmic in nature, if I explain it to two persons, you have been paid back. Atle _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
