> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:35:56PM +0200, Andreas Voegele wrote: > > In /include/bits/errno.h both ENOTSUP and ECANCELED get the value > > _HURD_ERRNO(118). Is this intended? > > I don't think so. Roland can you fix this if it is wrong?
They certainly should not have the same number. The Hurd numbers are determined by magic comments in libc/manual/errno.texi; it appears that someone added some codes to errno.texi with magic comments and picked some random numbers for them (probably Linux numbers) instead of omitting them. That needs to be fixed. Can you compare all the numbers in errno.texi with those that existing Hurd binaries were really using, and assign unused numbers to any excess errno codes the Hurd didn't previously have? _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
