Jonas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > L4Mach would make no sense - L4+Mach maybe (running a mach os on a l4 > microkernel system)
Correct. There's no such thing as L4Mach, as far as I'm aware. It should be possible to implement Mach on top of L4, and that was considered briefly when porting Hurd to L4 was first discussed. But I don't think there's much point in doing Mach on L4, and I don't know about anybody working on that. The hurd-l4 effort is trying to port the hurd libraries and servers to L4, and in that process some infrastructure which was provided by Mach but not by L4 must be written more or less from scratch. Regards, /Niels _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
