Has anyone a good idea to get gnumach-1-branch integrated as well? If I put it besides gnumach-1.9 every reference that occurs in both will triggger a selection, wich is horribly confusing and makes source code browsing much less usefull.
Would it be wise to establish a second reference with gnumach-1.{3,4} instead of 1.9?
Currently the data needs 836MB on disk (HTML only).
Given that GNUMach 1 is "resurrected", better (1) replace GNUMach 2 with GNUMach 1 and (2) put GNUMach 2 and Savannah OSKit in separate place, but referencing each other.
Regards, ogi
_______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
