Rian Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Any feedback is appreciated. I really hope other people might have >> other ideas to deal with this problem. Otherwise please tell me if >> either solution #1 or solution #2 is acceptable so I can continue >> hacking. > > Is it not possible to put all the changes in the pc-kbd driver > without the console client actually knowing?
No, that is not possible. > I have another and possibly slower solution. Maybe external libtrivfs > translators can be set up in dev as kbd and mouse. The pc_kbd and > pc_mouse driver in the console-client simply write to those translators > to repeat the data. Since the keyboard and mouse are only input devices, > XFree would only read from those translators. This way the > console-client doesn't have to have any libtrivfs code (or > modifications) and you can have as many repeaters as you want. Does that > sound feasible? or does it conflict with the way things are? This is possible, but that slows things down for no good reason. I don't think such extra layer is required and I prefer to do this in the console client somehow. Of course it is really easy to fix the problem this way. -- Marco _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
