"Erik van der Poel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Ok. Pointers to the mailing list may suffice if we can give a good >> explanation of the problem. > > This is the beginning of the thread (even though it includes an > excerpt from an earlier thread): > > http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/2008-January/000811.html
Thanks. I'm reviewing the current IDNAbis specification to see if they handle backwards compatibility OK with regard to something like this, and will hopefully send comments to the idna-update list. /Simon _______________________________________________ Help-libidn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-libidn
