On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Tim Ruehsen <tim.rueh...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Cool. Is the idn2_* intentional? I was thinking of providing >> compatibility in a way that sources do not need to be changed at all >> (i.e., provide an idna.h, and compatibility idna_* functions - which >> could also be wrappers). It would be very nice if we could compile >> programs that use libidn, using libidn2 without any changes (at least >> for the majority of them). > The naming is intentional because > 1. What about apps providing idna2003 *and* idna2008 (libidn and libidn2) ? > 2. idn2_ is the namespace for libidn2 (mainly because of 1) > We could use a define being set before #include <idn2.h>, e.g. > IDN2_LIBIDN_API. > WDYT ? I'd expect the idna2003 + idna2008 apps to be rare, but you got a point. I think the define approach is reasonable. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ Help-libidn mailing list Help-libidn@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-libidn
