Yuchen Pei <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 12 2022, Eric Gallager wrote: > >> Hi, I am a state-level legislator in New Hampshire and have a bill >> (HB1273, which I call the "SOFTWARE Act") that, among other things, >> would require LibreJS compatibility with state websites. It might not >> say "LibreJS" specifically in the bill, but that's the basic goal of >> the section on proprietary javascript. The bill has been mentioned on >> libreplanet-discuss recently: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2022-01/msg00044.html >> (I'm not subscribed to that list, though, so that's why I'm not >> replying there) >> I am wondering what sort of assistance that LibreJS developers and >> users could provide to our state Department of Information Technology >> to help this happen? Note that there is some Nitter discussion of the >> LibreJS provision here: >> https://nitter.net/cooljeanius/status/1481231381502046211 > > Thanks for the bill. I like the idea of ensuring government services to > be usable without nonfree JS. It seems to me the biggest challenge from > LibreJS is to get more adoption and compliance. There has been a design > proposal to get LibreJS better at recognising free javascript. I'll > need to read it again and work on it or share the ideas at this list or > bug-librejs. > >> Thanks, >> Eric Gallager >> > > > Best, > Yuchen Along with what Yuchen said, I think the FSF and LibreJS volunteers would be interested in helping with any specific problems that come up, within our resources. -- Ian Kelling | Senior Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation GPG Key: B125 F60B 7B28 7FF6 A2B7 DF8F 170A F0E2 9542 95DF https://fsf.org | https://gnu.org
