On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree -- and considered doing this when we did the 'small_value' (see > int.h) change that we did earlier. However, I think actually GnuTLS was > one consumer of the node_asn_struct... I think it was only in some > X.509 Name functions contributed by Howard Chu, so perhaps we can > rewrite only those parts. > With that fixed, I think we could roll a libtasn1 3.x branch that > removed the struct, and move on from there... that would allow a > rewrite of the internal tree stuff without breaking API/ABI. I'll check how easy it is to re-write the name functions without the internal API. regards, Nikos
