On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:32:15PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:12:56PM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I still see: > > > PASS: certificate_set_x509_crl > > > > > > Did you also apply the first patch? That fixes an existing bug > > > that causes errors for me too in the libtasn1 test suite. > > > > Could it be that it isn't linked to the new libtasn1, or using the > > included? Yes, I had both 2 patches applied. I'll check again once > > back home. > > I assumed I was using the minitasn1 version, but it seems it's > linked to libtasn1 anyway. > > When I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point to the new one, I actually end > up with: > # TOTAL: 83 > # PASS: 55 > # SKIP: 2 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 26 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > > Looks like lots of fun.
At first sight, it looks like a problem in the _asn1_ordering_set_of() function. I think it now gets called properly but I think it screws something up. The logic in it looks weird, and I don't know enough about BER yet to know what it should do in the first place. I'll try to take a look at this soon. Kurt
