On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 05:53:03PM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Sat, 2014-04-26 at 18:15 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > So I can't see how the old code really sorted like it's supposed > > to. We're probably lacking a test case that checks the result of > > the coding is really what we produced. But this seems more likely > > to actually produce the expected output. > > Do you have some example of a SET OF structure that is correctly sorted? > We can then have a test that decodes it and re-encodes it to verify the > new code.
Test_tree loads one that is not correctly sorted, encodes it as DER at which points it gets sorted and then decodes it again. As far as I can see that decoded version is correctly sorted. Kurt
