Hello, I've recently seen how libtasn1 works, and it seems to be a useful tool. What I don't understand is how efficient it works internally? It looks like it allocates lots of pieces of memory, and that might slow down its performance in comparison to more dedicated (protocol-specific) alternatives. Am I mistaken?
If it is sufficiently efficient for processing of high-bandwidth traffic, it might be interesting to implement an LDAP server that can have plugins, in a similar fashion as libevtp. Although OpenLDAP is very flexible towards admins, it is not very friendly to developers who want to plugin a subtree with special, dynamic behaviour. Thanks, -Rick
