Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> jm> However, on Win32 I have lost parallel builds.
>
>Sorry, I don't follow: how do you mean ``lost''? Did your previous
>setup somehow allowed parallel builds on Windows?
Yes. -j works fine on Windows NT, as long as you don't have submakes.
>FWIW, DJGPP does support sigactions. Non-blocking reads could be
>replaced with a timer that calls select().
The current code looks like it depends on atomically getting an interrupt or
a token. My guess is that the race conditions would be ugly.
Jan Mikkelsen.
