> %% Nicholas Leippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > nl> I narrowed the problem down to some subtle issues with the dependency > nl> generation. (*.d files) > > You should avoid that method of dependency generation. It's difficult > to work with (as you've discovered) and it also has other problems. > > See my web site below for a better method for handling automatic > dependencies. > I have built my Makefile system based on the ideas presented in Peter Miller's paper: http://www.pcug.org.au/~millerp/rmch/recu-make-cons-harm.html I'm pleased to have gotten this far :) I read your page. I am now (finally) building my dependencies as described under 'Basic Auto-Dependencies', so that much of the problem I have solved. From your page, however, I now understand that there is quite a bit more I can do for greater efficiency. My design goal is to be as efficient as possible- -so I'll start looking at implementing the remedies you list. _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
