PDS> [ concise and cogent disuccsion of the implementation omitted ] PDS> PDS> So. The question is, would it be a good idea for an invocation PDS> of call to "blank out" all the variables (by declaring that PDS> variable with the empty value in the innermost scope before PDS> expanding the function)?
If you're asking my opinion, then "yes". It seems the $1...$n variables form a very special case in variable creation, use, and scope. It would make sense to me to have the $(call) operation hide from nested scopes the $n variables it creates. How this hiding is implemented is best decided by you. Thanks! -- Robert _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
