Following "Recursive Make Considered Harmful" Peter Miller and Paul D.
Smith, "Advanced Auto-Dependency Generation" I created a Makefile that
generates the dependencies of c-sources (%.P) when compiling the c-source.
While avoiding re-exec of make, if dependency file does not exist and
avoiding 'no rule to make target ...' if a prerequisite is removed there is
still a problem left.
If anyone kills just dependency-files, make wouldn't do anything, but I
would prefer make to recompile and regenerate dependencies. For I couldn't
find anything that helps, in my typical naive way I just tried a second
prerequisite-pattern :
%.o: %.c %.P
... and what a surprise, it worked with my cygwin's gnu-make 3.80 :-)
Now the questions:
Is this a legal construction and should it work with other gnu-makes on
other platforms too?
And if it's neither legal nor globally available, does anybody now a way to
fix the problem?
On the other hand, if everything is correct, does exist a documentation
about this?
Rolf
===========
Sample:
SRCS := main.c
OBJDIR := .
# determine the object files
OBJS := ${patsubst %,${OBJDIR}/%,${patsubst %.c,%.o, ${filter
%.c,${SRCS}}}}
DEPS := ${patsubst %.o,%.P,${OBJS}}
MAKEDEPEND = gcc -M $< > ${basename [EMAIL PROTECTED]
COMPILE.c := gcc ${CFLAGS}
proj: $(OBJS)
${OBJDIR}/%.o: %.c ${OBJDIR}/%.P
${MAKEDEPEND};\
cp ${basename [EMAIL PROTECTED] ${basename [EMAIL PROTECTED]; \
sed -e 's/^[^:]*: *//' -e 's/ *\\$$//' \
-e '/^$$/ d' -e 's/$$/ :/' < ${basename [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> ${basename
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
rm -f $*.d
${COMPILE.c} -o $@ $<
${DEPS}:
-include $(OBJS:%.o=%.P)
_______________________________________________
Help-make mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
