Wouldn't it require Plan9?
It looks nice, but doesn't seem to add a whole lot beyond what make already
has. The only thing I noticed that I liked was regular expression pattern
rules. However I wasn't able to find any details. I'd like to able to
something like this without have to resort to using eval to create huge
makefiles.
Q%(1)_DB%(2).txt : %(1).q %(2).db
buildme %(1).q %(2).db > $@
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 07:46 am, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 07:19:33AM -0700, Mike Gibson wrote:
> ...
> # The successor to make is going to have to look a lot like make to be
> # successful.
>
> Have you looked at plan9's mk?
>
> http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/ and
> http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/mk.html
>
> I haven't used it yet, so can't say how successful it might be.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jens
_______________________________________________
Help-make mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
