Ken Smith
Noel Yap wrote:
Boris Kolpackov wrote:"Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:That might be true, but Lisp is really a very good language for a make scripting language, since much of make's behavior, at least in terms of expansion of variables, etc. is somewhat Lisp-like already.Just a thought: rather than adding a lisp-like language to make wouldn't it be easier to implement make-like inference system in lisp? Comments?The meat of make is rule-based so I would think that replacing this with a functional programming language would not be a good thing. MTC, Noel
_______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
