Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This rings a bell with me. Ah yes, I see you sent this back on 10 Feb.
It is really surprising how you guessed the relation even though I never sent a patch ;-). This additional if() proved to be important when I have two other patches installed: one for dontcare flag inheritance and the other is for implicit phony suppression. I can't seem to find an example without those patches that will make a difference (but it doesn't mean there is no such example ;-) ). > I don't know that it's really a problem since f->prev will be NULL for > single-colon targets and the loop will fall through. It is only the case when f = f->prev in the previous loop has been executed. Look at all those 'break's in that loop that leave 'f' non-null. > But, I'll check it out. Thanks, -boris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
