Noel Yap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry for the confusion and for inadvertently implying you were stupid.
I was just joking ;-) > Currently, are the dependencies files regenerated due to a "-include", or > as part of the object file being built? The latter. > When you say "re-exec", do you mean a re-exec due to an included makefile > being rebuilt? Or due to make recursively calling itself? The latter again. All those re-execs are done explicitly via "make -C ...". > Can you elaborate on what you mean by "up-to-date build" below? It means that everything is up-to-date. When you run make on such a build no files change and make happily says that nothing needs to be done. That's what you usually get when you run make second time on the same build. -boris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
