I think my point is completely being missed.
I don't think it's being missed, it's being not-completely-agreed-with.
This is surely unsafe (ie will likely cause memory corruption somewhere)
Agreed.
and only the decision not to allow "#include <Foo.H>" will resolve the situation.
This is not correct. Depending on the searched directories *is* another way to solve the same problem. Which way is better is an open question: reasonable people may disagree and those people may even change their minds depending on circumstances. I'm comfortable with noting that both options are on the table.
-David
_______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
