%% Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: bk> As you can see there is some symmetry in current logic. Now having bk> said that I tend to agree that the first case is somewhat bk> surprising at the least and should be fixed. Paul seems to bk> disagree with this, however.
I didn't say I disagreed, I said that any change to the expansion rules, even for just one function, needs to be carefully examined. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
