On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 11:07, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i suspected as much, but you can see how the way that sentence is > phrased in the book would lead someone to a noticeably different > conclusion, right?
Yes, the language was a little sloppy. But that doesn't stop it being a much needed book. The two essential books are the FSF's GNU Make manual and the Mecklenburg book. > certainly, if you were doing a parallel make, make would have the > freedom to process the dependencies any way it wanted, no? Precisely. John. -- John Graham-Cumming Home: http://www.jgc.org/ Work: http://www.electric-cloud.com/ POPFile: http://getpopfile.org/ GNU Make Standard Library: http://gmsl.sf.net/ _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
