Hi Alexey. I need to read your email in more detail to understand the issue and think about possible solutions. Before that happens I can't say whether or not the method you describe, which seems at first glance like a big change both to the code and to some current behaviors, will be accepted/acceptable.
So, if you would like to proceed with this work as a proof-of-concept that's great, just so long as expectations are set properly. Alternatively we can continue to have a conversation about it and maybe come up with an alternative... or not. I'm bogged down with some other things right now so it will take me a week or so to spend the time necessary to think about this issue. There is also a thread on a .WAIT proposal from last year on one of the make mailing lists which discusses a number of scenarios. You may have already read that one. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
