Eli Zaretskii wrote on 29 May 2008 19:11:
>> From: "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 18:28:56 +0100
>> Cc: [email protected]
>>
>> Paul Smith wrote on 29 May 2008 18:08:
>>
>>> My limited knowledge of Windows leads me to believe that the working
>>> directory is a function of the system (or at least the login) rather
>>> than the process, like it is on UNIX.
>>
>> ;-) Not since Windows 3.1, IIRC! I'm fairly sure that even '95 had a
>> separate CWD for each dos shell window you started.
>
> Not with command.com as your shell, AFAIK. So only starting with
> Windows NT this is true.
You may very well remember better than I do; it has been a while since I
last used it! (I inferred that, since w95 was the first version of windows
to properly lift itself up out of real-mode by instanceing the underlying
DOS machine at start up, it might have been able to launch each new DOS box
freshly from the original and keep separate non-interfering state for each.)
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
_______________________________________________
Help-make mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
