On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Per Jessen <[email protected]> wrote: > yeah, SYNCSH_SERIALIZE is equal to what I do today using this construct: > > (flock -s 200; some-command $^ $@) 200>/var/lock/some-lockfile > > It satisfies the single-thread requirement, but in massively parallel > runs, several of these often end up waiting for each other. It would be > optimal if make knew not to submit more than 1 at a time, I was just > wondering if I'd skipped a page in the manual :-)
Could you rephrase this? I can't see a meaningful distinction between "waiting for each other" and "submit one at a time". Either way they're serialized, no? -David _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
