Hi Paul et. al., When a rule has multiple prerequisites I sometimes use make variables to refer to them positionally, like this:
^1=$(word 1,$^) ^2=$(word 2,$^) ^3=$(word 3,$^) ^2..=$(wordlist 2,$(words $^),$^) ^3..=$(wordlist 3,$(words $^),$^) %.foo: %.bar %.baz %.bat1 %.bat2 %.bat3 process --baz ${^2}--bar ${^1} --bat ${^3..} > $@ What do you think of such syntactic sugar? Is there any sweeter version? Is there some way to bind pattern specific variables to prerequisite using some syntax allowing rules such as: %.foo: a:=%.bar b:=%.baz c:=%.bat1 %.bat2 %.bat3 process --baz ${b}--bar ${a} --bat ${c} > $@ Might this be candidate for a new feature request? Are there any other similar such ideas percolating? FWIW - I mainly use make to structure bioinformatics analysis pipelines. Cheers, Malcolm Cook Manager, Database Applications Big Data AI and GenomicsĀ Stowers Institute for Medical Research