help-make  

Messages by Thread

• gmsl tar file issue Galen Seitz
• warning: type of ‘error’ does not match original declaration R. Diez
  • Re: warning: type of ‘error’ does not match original declaration Paul Smith
• demonstrating trivial issue with make running in parallel rpjday
• looking for assistance with "parallel" makefile, willing to pay Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: looking for assistance with "parallel" makefile, willing to pay Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: looking for assistance with "parallel" makefile, willing to pay Robert P. J. Day
• Passing jobserver file descriptors to all children R. Diez
  • Re: Passing jobserver file descriptors to all children Paul Smith
  • Re: Passing jobserver file descriptors to all children R. Diez
• I want to port make on Windows using tcc compiler Christian Jullien
  • RE: *** SPAM *** [Tinycc-devel] I want to port make on Windows using tcc compiler Christian Jullien
  • Re: *** SPAM *** [Tinycc-devel] I want to port make on Windows using tcc compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: I want to port make on Windows using tcc compiler Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
• GNU make 4.3 released! Paul Smith
  • Re: GNU make 4.3 released! Nicholas Clark
• Ask for GNU make Windows binary zi li
  • Re: Ask for GNU make Windows binary Paul Smith
  • Re: Ask for GNU make Windows binary Eli Zaretskii
• using contemporary (q)make with Grid Engine OGS/GE 2011.11p1. -- approaches sought Cook, Malcolm
• ordering in automatic variable lists David Boyce
• Re: Linking inside of pattern rules Paul Smith
• GNU make 4.2.93 release candidate available Paul Smith
• tarball compression Kiyoshi KANAZAWA
  • Re: tarball compression Paul Smith
• Dumb Questions Lee Eric
  • Re: Dumb Questions Paul Smith
  • Dumb Questions via Users list for the GNU implementation of make
  • Re: Dumb Questions Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
• minor suggestion for clarification of wildcards explanation in manual Robert P. J. Day
• simple explanation for order-only prerequisite? Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: simple explanation for order-only prerequisite? Nicholas Clark
  • Re: simple explanation for order-only prerequisite? Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: simple explanation for order-only prerequisite? pacalet
  • Re: simple explanation for order-only prerequisite? Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: simple explanation for order-only prerequisite? David Deutsch
• pedantic nitpickery: difference between "goal" and "target"? Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: pedantic nitpickery: difference between "goal" and "target"? David
  • Re: pedantic nitpickery: difference between "goal" and "target"? pacalet
• file versus identical symlink as a target? Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: file versus identical symlink as a target? Paul Smith
• proper (stylish) way for Makefile to determine top of source tree? Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: proper (stylish) way for Makefile to determine top of source tree? Tim Murphy
  • Re: proper (stylish) way for Makefile to determine top of source tree? Jaap Fieret
• more style: sharing variable setting include/source files with scripts Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: more style: sharing variable setting include/source files with scripts Jaap Fieret
  • Re: more style: sharing variable setting include/source files with scripts Paul Smith
• is there a make style guide somewhere? Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: is there a make style guide somewhere? David
  • Re: is there a make style guide somewhere? Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: is there a make style guide somewhere? David
  • Re: is there a make style guide somewhere? Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: is there a make style guide somewhere? Galen Seitz
  • Re: is there a make style guide somewhere? Martin d'Anjou
  • Re: is there a make style guide somewhere? Robert P. J. Day
• Fyi: this list, help-make, just had it's subject [tag] and footer removed sysadmin
• my rules are ignored in favour of implicit rules. andreas graeper via Help-make
  • Re: my rules are ignored in favour of implicit rules. Paul Smith
• Brittle -includes David Deutsch
  • Re: Brittle -includes Paul Smith
  • Re: Brittle -includes David Deutsch
  • Re: Brittle -includes David Deutsch
  • Re: Brittle -includes Paul Smith
  • Re: Brittle -includes David Deutsch
  • Re: Brittle -includes Paul Smith
  • Re: Brittle -includes David Deutsch
• not sure about value of "$(lastword $(MAKEFILE_LIST))" in this example Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: not sure about value of "$(lastword $(MAKEFILE_LIST))" in this example Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: not sure about value of "$(lastword $(MAKEFILE_LIST))" in this example Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: not sure about value of "$(lastword $(MAKEFILE_LIST))" in this example Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: not sure about value of "$(lastword $(MAKEFILE_LIST))" in this example Robert P. J. Day
• where to send suggestions for current make manual? Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: where to send suggestions for current make manual? Paul Smith
• strange "out of order" output using "info" command in a rule Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: strange "out of order" output using "info" command in a rule Paul Smith
  • Re: strange "out of order" output using "info" command in a rule Robert P. J. Day
• anything special about "." prefixed targets other than default? Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: anything special about "." prefixed targets other than default? Paul Smith
  • Re: anything special about "." prefixed targets other than default? Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: anything special about "." prefixed targets other than default? Paul Smith
• GNU make 4.2.92 release candidate available Paul Smith
• GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Tony Theodore via Help-make
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Christian Hujer
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • RE: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Cook, Malcolm
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Juan Pablo Garibotti Arias
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • RE: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Brian Cowan
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • RE: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Brian Cowan
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 Paul Smith
  • Re: GMAKE 3.81 vs GMAKE 4.2 nikhil jain
• Multiple Types of Pattern Matching in Make Rahul Rameshbabu
  • Re: Multiple Types of Pattern Matching in Make Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
• GNU make 4.2.91 release candidate available Paul Smith
• target override only if there is a recipe for it? Brian J. Murrell
  • Re: target override only if there is a recipe for it? David Boyce
  • Re: target override only if there is a recipe for it? Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
• VPATH and include Sébastien Hinderer
  • Re: VPATH and include Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: VPATH and include Sébastien Hinderer
  • Re: VPATH and include Paul Smith
  • Re: VPATH and include Sébastien Hinderer
• GNU make 4.2.90 release candidate available Paul Smith
• Dependencies for clean rule Erik Rull
  • Re: Dependencies for clean rule Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: Dependencies for clean rule Christian Hujer
  • Re: Dependencies for clean rule Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: Dependencies for clean rule David Boyce
• ???????? Jaap Fieret
• GNU Make 4.2 Query nikhil jain
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query Paul Smith
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query Paul Smith
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query nikhil jain
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query nikhil jain
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query Paul Smith
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query nikhil jain
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query nikhil jain
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query nikhil jain
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query Paul Smith
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query nikhil jain
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query Paul Smith
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query nikhil jain
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query David Boyce
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query nikhil jain
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query David Boyce
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query nikhil jain
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query nikhil jain
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query Paul Smith
  • Re: GNU Make 4.2 Query nikhil jain
• Help Jaap Fieret
  • Help Jaap Fieret
• How does make decide if a binary is 'up to date' cdanek
  • Re: How does make decide if a binary is 'up to date' John Calcote
• Turning warning into errors Sébastien Hinderer
  • Re: Turning warning into errors Duane Griffin
  • Re: Turning warning into errors Sébastien Hinderer
  • Re: Turning warning into errors Kaz Kylheku (gmake)
  • Re: Turning warning into errors Sébastien Hinderer
  • Re: Turning warning into errors Duane Griffin
  • Re: Turning warning into errors Duane Griffin
  • Re: Turning warning into errors Paul Smith
  • Re: Turning warning into errors Sébastien Hinderer
• Auto-Dependency Generation Игорь Спиридонов
• Conditionally executing a script and using return value Thomas Nyberg

• Earlier messages
• Later messages