On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Bostjan Vilfan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Paul Eggert <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 03/24/2013 12:14 AM, Bostjan Vilfan wrote: >>> in other words, the retrieved revision is 1.15 instead of 1.1.1.6, which I >>> was expecting. Can someone, please, explain. >> >> Sounds like a bug. Can you post the ,v file? >> > > Hello, > Thanks for your quick answer. I am attaching the ,v file. > Regards, > Bostjan > > > --
Hello again, In the previous mail I forgot to add that I also tested rcs, version 5.8.1, on Ubuntu Linux, with the same ,v file, and obtained the same result. Therefore, it probably is a bug. Regards, Bostjan
