Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Btw, Nikos, do you know if there is any license problem to use GPLv3 > code with mod_gnutls? As far as I understand, GPLv3 is compatible with > the Apache license, even though GPLv2 was not compatible. But I may > have missed some point.
I believe GPLv3 is compatible with the Apache 2.0 license. The resulting combined work must be distributed under the GPLv3 with the additional restriction clause exercised, as permitted by the GPLv3. The relevant additional restriction added to the license of the combined work is the Apache 2.0 patent provision. This response is based on an answer by RMS to a similar question on another mailing list. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Help-shishi mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-shishi
