I know I should have spoken up earlier, but I am a bit disappointed
about the special syntax for Unicode character constants.

My feeling is that much of the beauty of Smalltalk comes from the fact
that it has very little in the way of syntax. Also, is it compatible
with other Smalltalk dialects? "258 asCharacter" would be, at least
potentially.

Mike


_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Reply via email to