J Pfersich wrote: > Off topic for the subject line. > > Yes, touch doesn't update the timestamp. It seems that the open-close is > optimized out of existence. I tried other means, but got the same > results (like adding a position 0 before the close). > A primitive using utimes would fix it, but I'm not sure how to do it (at > least I haven't tried it). I tried to utimes on Linux and Mac and it > worked beautifully, not sure about other platforms.
man utime says it's POSIX. I'd be in favour of adding #utime and removing #touch if anyone cared to do the work ;) Mike _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
