Luca Bruno wrote:
Hello,
i was thinking of splitting packages.xml into more files, or better:
1) Have packages.xml for specifying each packages path (for example
browser/ gtk.tar.gz, and so on)
2) Each package must have a package.xml containing its own informations
3) Use VFSHandler to handle packages, which can be directories or
archives
Sure, why not. I agree with all of this (except that I would keep the
possibility of a centralized packages.xml both for backwards
compatibility and to ease pre-installation development).
My plan is to finish 2.3 as soon as possible and then (possibly on a new
web site!) prepare a wishlist page for 2.4.
Paolo
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
