In data 02 ottobre 2006 alle ore 07:37:36, Paolo Bonzini
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
Luca Bruno wrote:
Hello,
sorry if my patches are really small, this is the first time i'm
reading the code ;)
No problem. It's the right way to start. Still, please configure your
mailer to encode them as text/plain rather than application/octet-stream.
However this patch set verbosity > 2 for both Scavenging messages and
readline symbols traceback on SIGINT, which are pretty boring.
The latter is wrong because in some cases (SIGSEGV) the backtrace is
necessary. I'd prefer something like this:
I was looking at this:
case SIGINT:
is_serious_error = false;
if (!_gst_non_interactive && in_interpreter)
{
_gst_set_signal_handler (sig, interrupt_handler);
stop_executing ("userInterrupt");
return;
}
break;
Isn't ^C an user interruption?
if (is_serious_error || sig == SIGUSR1
|| (_gst_verbosity > 2 && (ip || _gst_gc_running))
Can you confirm that it works?
Paolo
Is important to show backtrace for SIGUSR1 anyway if verbosity is less
than 3?
if (is_serious_error || (_gst_verbosity > 2 && (ip ||
_gst_gc_running))
--
http://lethalman.blogspot.com - Thoughts about computer technologies
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
