Aren't these comments supposed to be different? Isn't FloatE a C float and
FloatQ a C long double? And should the precision not be mentioned as
they're different on my AMD64 beastie running a 64 bit Linux?
st> FloatQ comment !
'My instances represent floating point numbers that have 64 bits of
precision (well, less than that in precision; they are precisely the same
as C's "double" datatype). Besides the standard numerical operations,
I provide transcendental operations too.'
st> FloatD comment !
'My instances represent floating point numbers that have 64 bits of
precision (well, less than that in precision; they are precisely the same
as C's "double" datatype). Besides the standard numerical operations,
I provide transcendental operations too.'
st> FloatE comment !
'My instances represent floating point numbers that have 64 bits of
precision (well, less than that in precision; they are precisely the same
as C's "double" datatype). Besides the standard numerical operations,
I provide transcendental operations too.'
st>
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
