On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 09:57 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I'm not a big fan of computing selector names. Sorry. :-(
That's too bad. I liked them because those accept*: can be pushed up to RBProgramNodeVisitor. Is there another way to generalize RBProgramNodeVisitor in such a fashion? > However, I like visitNode:onMatch: and the acceptCascadeNode: fixes. > With your tests in hand I can take care of merging only those parts. Might visitNodeList:visitor:onMatch: also be included and used where relevant? This gives just enough dynamism that my rewriter subclass works without overriding accept*:. -- Stephen Compall http://scompall.nocandysw.com/blog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
