Jānis Rūcis wrote:
"Answer a new instance of Dictionary initialized from the keys and
values of Associations in anArray. This method is for convenience
only; it allows its argument to be conveniently specified as a
braced Array literal that is structured accordingly: {'key' ->
'value'. 'another key' -> 'another value'}."
And maybe suggest that any other usage is considered "misuse" and is
"strongly discouraged or bad things will happen"... :) Basically I
think it should make it very clear that it's there for convenience.
I would like to avoid repeating what is already said in Collection
class>>#from:'s docstring. Is there a way to document Dictionary in a
way that is less confusing but avoids explaining what is already
specified elsewhere?
--
;;; Stephen Compall ** http://scompall.nocandysw.com/blog **
Failure to imagine vast possibilities usually stems from a lack of
imagination, not a lack of possibility.
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
