Hello Paolo, On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I am not sure if it is the same bug, but the unexplainable behavior in > your message disappeared if I changed the timestamp comparisons to also > look at the nanosecond field. It might be just a race condition that is > more frequent with the system libsigsegv (possibly because there is less > time between the installation of kernel files and the image?? I don't know). > > You can try this patch, which I tested on ppc-apple-darwin and > i686-linux (Debian, both with/without system libsigsegv).
I've just tried your patch on GNU Smalltalk 2.95e and it works, thanks! Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
