Hi, Paolo, people,
Once Paolo has mentioned GIT as a replacement for GNU arch (aka tla). I
personally use git and very much satisfied with it. In opposite, arch
doesn't look beautiful by design and low in performance. (That in the
1st sight). Hence 2 questions:
1. What SCM do you (Paolo) use personally: Arch or GIT? If GIT, can I
clone your repo?
2. What do you - people - think about moving to GIT?
That, of course after release 3.0, as I understand that it's not the
best time for such a change and other infrastructure changes..
Thanks and best regards, Ildar.
--
Ildar Mulyukov, free SW designer/programmer
================================================
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
home: http://tuganger.narod.ru/
ALT Linux Sisyphus
================================================
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk