Stephen Compall <s11 <at> member.fsf.org> writes: > > Well, considering that the backtrace is innermost-first, it's pretty > clear that the specific #value message is one within the method > True>>and:, not one you wrote yourself (unless you changed that method > for some reason). So you are looking for an #and: that you wrote, not a > #value. I would guess that you passed a non-block as the argument. >
But I also have a lot of and: messages in my code so again finding the right one is difficult. Actually, I corrected the error by trial and error method ( ;-) ), but it is really difficult and I face this situation a lot in GNU Smalltalk. _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
