Le vendredi 21 novembre 2008 à 17:36 +0100, Paolo Bonzini a écrit : > > It looks like the printNl made it crash, which may be normal, I don't > > know, that's why I'm asking. > > Yes, the example is biased because printing 10000 factorial is much > heavier than computing it. You should compare "10000 factorial" with a > print-it on Squeak. To compare with doits, use something like "10000 > factorial; yourself" or "10000 factorial size".
I did it, and results are not really better: it still takes 6 seconds to compute 5000 factorial and 21 seconds to compute 10000 factorial, while with Squeak it only takes 100 milliseconds and 420 milliseconds, and I got similar results with VisualWorks. > > > BTW, in Squeak it takes 397 ms on my computer to run 10000 factorial > > while it takes more than 26 seconds with gst. > > Hum, it crashes almost instantly here, even with #millisecondsToRun:. Yes, it does sometimes here too, but not always... Nico
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
