Issue status update for
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/286
Post a follow up:
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/comments/add/286
Project: GNU Smalltalk
Version: <none>
Component: VM
Category: bug reports
Priority: normal
Assigned to: Unassigned
Reported by: dpollet
Updated by: bonzinip
Status: active
That would mean you have to keep potentially the entire class in memory,
right? Right now the parse tree of GNU Smalltalk is never deeper than a
method.
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
