On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:35:14 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> (But nevertheless, I discovered some differences between gst and > >> gst-remote, e.g. the order is very important for gst-remote in > >> which you load the several files into the vm. Otherwise, > >> gst-remote will print out warnings about not existent classes.) > > > > It might be a clue to where the problem is, though. > > Indeed. gst uses the builtin compiler (written in C), while > gst-remote uses the Parser and Compiler packages. Why is that? Technical considerations or the need for more control over what happens when? > Stephen Compall would be the right person to look into it (he was the > one stress-testing the Smalltalk compiler to the point that it became > usable for gst-remote), but he's not been active for a while. maybe, if we make enough noise, he'll hear us :-) s. _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
