On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:59:34 +0200 Nicolas Petton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > And with the page not being available to > > the application any more, it would be non-trivial to get to the > > body element. > > > > For the sake of the discussion: updateHead: and updateBody:? > > What would be the reason for having two methods? descriptive method names? I'm not sure of those myself, I just thought I'd bring them up. > > I still haven't explored how Iliad deals with decorators and what > > kind of things they can do. Assuming that they can wrap their > > contents: Would it make sense to implement the body tag as > > decorator? > > Hmm. I'm not sure I like the idea. How could this be useful? The body > element is just an element :) Aha... then decorators have to be widgets for that to be an argument :-) really off to work now, s.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
