On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:27:37 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, 25 simultaneous cold-cache accesses are pretty heavy, especially > if you consider that most production setups will use a load balancer. Just imagine ... all of this would not have happened, if I had managed to get my apache config right ... we'd have stayed below the critical threshold like all the others :-) > The root cause of the CLOSE_WAIT bug is definitely there in upstream > Swazoo. You had 1000 open sockets, presumably because of keep-alive > behavior of Swazoo (I'll research what apache or lighttpd do) manage their own socket pools? > But this is very comforting for me, because it shows we're doing things > seriously. Thanks. What is comforting for me is that there are smart guys out there who tell me a) that it was not my fault and b) that it can be fixed :-) s. _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
