On 07. 03. 2010 11:00, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 03/07/2010 10:59 AM, Janko Mivšek wrote: >> This is actually very good idea and because we need to reimplement the >> Swazoo HTTP messaging part due to licensing reasons anyway, even more >> timely. > > Don't get me started on this... Are you sure there's no more pressing > need for Swazoo?
Certainly, like improving the HTTP Server part according to your suggestions and actual code. Also unifiying the portability layer (Sport and Grease) under a common umbrella is a good idea, then we can move Swazoo on that layer. But Julian's idea came just at the right moment and it has a broader appeal. We can then redesign the HTTP server part in the meantime. I see many synergies there. Best regards Janko _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
