On Mar 9, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 18:53, stephane ducasse > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks thanks thanks thanks for a refresh on that! >> Thanks! > > Stef, instead of thanking five times, why don't you try to do > something constructive?
do you think that pharo is not constructive enough :) > The GPLv3 includes a system of granting Additional Permissions. This > system has already been used by GCC and Autoconf. Let's develop a set > of additional permissions that we believe do not "taint" the whole > image. I placed a starting point at > http://smalltalk.gnu.org/blog/bonzinip/towards-permissive-copyleft-license-dynamic-languages > > [To those that followed the entire thread: this is totally independent > of how any GSoC code related to GNU Smalltalk will be licensed]. Paolo what I learned is that I want to be as far as possible from license problems. So I avoid them simply either I would do GPL/dual licensing to get company pay to get it. or MIT because I understand it. I know this is naive but I hate licenses! They fucked up our lives. Stef _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
