On Thu, 27 May 2010 07:30:48 +0200, Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/26/2010 09:23 PM, Rick Flower wrote: >> sigaction(SIGALRM, 0xFFBEE9B8, 0x00000000) = 0 > > This is not coming from GNU Smalltalk. I always have a non-NULL third > argument. Can you put a breakpoint on sigaction, conditional on the > third argument being nil, and see if you can get a backtrace?
That seems to be about right -- I actually put an assert in the offending code within _gst_set_signal_handler() to ensure the o_act argument is always non-null.. I rebuild and reran the test code and it still fails but not on the assert -- which never triggered. I'll look some more.. to see what is causing this.. It's hard to tell without a stackdump.. _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
